A question rooted in the physical world.
Vatsal Soin is an Indian inventor and systems theorist. He grew up in a family that had spent generations in manufacturing and footwear — a world of making things, moving them, and trying to match what came off the line to what people actually needed.
That is where the question started, and it never really left him: why does what gets made so rarely fit what is needed?
He read economics and finance at the Singapore Institute of Management, on the RMIT University degree, then went on to a Master of Science in Technopreneurship and Innovation — the degree conferred by Nanyang Technological University — and received a Certificate of Completion from Stanford University's Center for Professional Development for the same programme. Most of the years after that were spent close to products and supply chains rather than in a lab — which is probably why the problem he kept returning to was always such a practical one.
The early work — footwear fit, apparel sizing, biometric interoperability, design automation — was really the same question asked in narrower and narrower forms. Over time, and a fair amount of formal effort, those threads pulled together into what became the 0→1 Doctrine.
It started with a shoe.
"I tried to understand why a product designed for mass production does not fit everyone perfectly. The foot is not standard. Neither is the person wearing the shoe. The industry knew this and ignored it. The entire supply chain was optimised for the average. The average is a fiction. No one is average."
That observation — that averages destroy fit — extended from footwear to apparel, then to pharmaceuticals, then to procurement, then to AI. Every domain had the same structure: a need on one side, a supply on the other, and an aggregation system in the middle that pretended the two were compatible without ever checking.
The answer, when it came, was not an improvement to existing systems. It was a different architecture. Instead of aggregating measurements into a score, convert each measurement into a normalised band and check whether the bands intersect. Instead of issuing advice, issue a sealed receipt. Instead of reviewing decisions after the fact, authorise them before execution.
The 0→1 Doctrine is the formalisation of that architecture — now protected by filed patents across six continents, with a published press trail across major Indian and international outlets.
Granted and filed across six continents.
| Status | Number | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| Granted | US 12,446,652 B2 | Customisable Detachable Footwear |
| Granted | JP 7560909 | Customisable Detachable Footwear |
| Granted | IN 454081 | Customisable Detachable Footwear |
| Granted | ZA 202406743B | Customisable Detachable Footwear (South Africa) |
| Filed | PCT/IN2025/051943 | 0→1 Doctrine — Universal Pre-Execution Governance Architecture |
| Filed | PCT/IN2025/051618 | DFI / VFI Footwear Architecture |
| Filed | US 19/489,595 | 0→1 Doctrine (United States) |
| Filed | India 202511115781 | 0→1 Doctrine (India) |
| Filed | AU 2022450649 | Customisable Footwear |
Further filings across Brazil, the European Patent Office, China, Russia, and additional jurisdictions. All patent references are informational — verify current grant status through the relevant patent office. Unauthorised commercial use may constitute infringement upon jurisdictional grant.